GeoGebra and ninth-grade students’ understanding of relationships between lines
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: in the contemporary educational scenario, the teaching-learning of mathematics faces the challenge of promoting a deep understanding of concepts, overcoming traditional approaches focused on the mechanical repetition of procedures. Objectives: the objective of the study was to design and implement a pedagogical strategy based on six interactive activities with GeoGebra and to describe the variations observed in the understanding of the relationships between lines in ninth grade students of a bilingual intercultural rural institution in the canton of Guaranda, Ecuador. Methodology: a quantitative, applied, and field approach was adopted, with a pre-experimental single-group design with pre-test and post-test measurements (O₁–X–O₂). The population consisted of 60 students, and, through non-probabilistic convenience sampling, a sample of 15 students was selected for the intervention. An objective test, an analytical rubric and an observation sheet were used; Because the instruments had different maximum scores, the raw results were transformed into a common percentage scale. Results: the descriptive evaluation showed favorable variations in the four competencies analyzed: graphic interpretation, slope calculation, parallelism and perpendicularity, and graphic-algebraic relationships. Conclusions: the results support the pedagogical relevance of integrating GeoGebra, multiple representations and contextualized teacher mediation, although, due to the characteristics of the design, they do not allow establishing causality or statistical generalization. It is recommended that future research use parallel and validated instruments, comparison groups, larger and more diverse samples, and longitudinal follow-ups to examine the stability and transferability of the observed learning. General area of study: Education. Specific area of study: Mathematics didactics and educational technology. Type of item: original.
Downloads
Article Details
dssfdsf
dsfdsf
References
Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques, 1970–1990. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2
Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2020). Teaching with digital technology. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1223–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01196-0
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://repositorio.ciem.ucr.ac.cr/items/cec131b5-1934-4fc7-81cf-bc413895502e
Drijvers, P., & Sinclair, N. (2024). The role of digital technologies in mathematics education: purposes and perspectives. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 56(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01535-x
Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
Engelbrecht, J., & Borba, M. C. (2024). Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 56(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2
Gökçe, S., & Güner, P. (2022). Dynamics of GeoGebra ecosystem in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5301–5323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10836-1
Gurmu, F., Tuge, C., & Hunde, A. B. (2024). Effects of GeoGebra-assisted instructional methods on students' conceptual understanding of geometry. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2379745
Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa [INEVAL]. (2023). Presentación de los resultados de la evaluación Ser Estudiante 2022–2023. https://evaluaciones.evaluacion.gob.ec/BI/presentacion-de-los-resultados-de-la-evaluacion-ser-estudiante-2022-2023/
Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., Tamur, M., Perbowo, K. S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). A meta-analysis of GeoGebra software decade of assisted mathematics learning: What to learn and where to go? Heliyon, 7(5), e06953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06953
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2019). Currículo de los niveles de educación obligatoria – Subnivel superior. https://siteal.iiep.unesco.org/sites/default/files/sit_accion_files/11031.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura [UNESCO]. (2025). What you need to know on quality learning. https://www.unesco.org/en/quality-learning/need-know
Romero Albaladejo, I. M., & García López, M. del M. (2024). Mathematical attitudes transformation when introducing GeoGebra in the secondary classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 10277–10302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12085-w
Weinhandl, R., Lavicza, Z., Hohenwarter, M., & Schallert, S. (2020). Enhancing flipped mathematics education by utilizing GeoGebra. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.v8i1.832
Yohannes, A., & Chen, H.-L. (2023). GeoGebra in mathematics education: A systematic review of journal articles published from 2010 to 2020. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5682–5697. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2016861
Zhang, Y., Wang, P., Jia, W., Zhang, A., & Chen, G. (2025). Dynamic visualization by GeoGebra for mathematics learning: a meta-analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(2), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2250886